Lyon v. Banks
This text of 18 A.D.2d 1099 (Lyon v. Banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, in which the three defendants named Banks interposed a third-party complaint, the said defendants and third-party plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 9, 1962 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff and upon the court’s decision (rendered after the verdict pursuant to stipulation) in favor of the third-party defendant, dismissing the third-party complaint. Judgment modified on the law and the facts as follows: (1) by striking out its first decretal paragraph directing that plaintiff recover of the three defendants Banks the sum of $145,216; and (2) by substituting therefor a provision dismissing the complaint on the law against said defendants. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. On this record, and under the applicable law, plaintiff did not establish: (a) that there was any duty owing to him by the defendants Banks which was violated by them; (b) that there was any causal relationship between the accident and anything that said defendants did or failed to do; and (c) that he was free from contributory negligence. In view of our determination that the main [1100]*1100complaint must be dismissed, the trial court’s dismissal of the third-party complaint'should be affirmed. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan- and Rabin, JJ., concur.-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 A.D.2d 1099, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyon-v-banks-nyappdiv-1963.