Lynnell F. Halthon v. Michigan Department of Corrections

865 F.2d 258, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17012, 1988 WL 132761
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 1988
Docket88-1194
StatusUnpublished

This text of 865 F.2d 258 (Lynnell F. Halthon v. Michigan Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynnell F. Halthon v. Michigan Department of Corrections, 865 F.2d 258, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17012, 1988 WL 132761 (6th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

865 F.2d 258

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Lynnell F. HALTHON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-1194.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 14, 1988.

Before MERRITT, BOYCE F. MARTIN Jr. and NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

Lynnell F. Halthon brought suit against the Michigan Department of Corrections alleging that her employment as a corrections officer was terminated in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e, et seq. The district court dismissed plaintiff's suit for failure to establish a prima facie case as required by McDonnell Douglas v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973).

Upon review, we conclude that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case and that dismissal of the suit was proper.

Accordingly, plaintiff's request for counsel is denied. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 F.2d 258, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17012, 1988 WL 132761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynnell-f-halthon-v-michigan-department-of-correct-ca6-1988.