Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates v. Borough of Millersville
738 A.2d 993, 558 Pa. 564, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 1294
This text of 738 A.2d 993 (Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates v. Borough of Millersville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates v. Borough of Millersville, 738 A.2d 993, 558 Pa. 564, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 1294 (Pa. 1999).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 1999, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal LIMITED to the following issues:
Whether the Supreme Court should let stand a decision that allows a developer to use a road on someone else’s property to satisfy subdivision requirements, without even making the owner of that road a party to his subdivision request. Whether the Supreme Court should let stand a decision which contradicts a 1972 decision of the Commonwealth Court regarding who must be joined as a party in a subdivision matter and deprives a property owner of due process by not requiring personal notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
738 A.2d 993, 558 Pa. 564, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 1294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynnebrook-woodbrook-associates-v-borough-of-millersville-pa-1999.