Lynne v. Irwin

147 So. 385, 226 Ala. 463, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 335
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 23, 1933·No. 8 Div. 444.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BOULDIN, Justice.

A creditor of an estate whose administration is pending in the probate court may, at any time before jurisdiction for final settlement in the probate court has attached, invoke the general jurisdiction of the court of equity for' the further administration and settlement of the estate by bill in equity without alleging any special equity. Rensford v. Magnus & Co., 150 Ala. 288, 43 So. 853; Carter v. Hutchens, 221 Ala. 370, 129 So. 8.

Under general rules touching the removal of causes from one court of competent jurisdiction to another, such a bill should be verified as to the facts on which the right of removal depends. Kelen v. Brewer, 221 Ala. 445, 129 So. 23, 26; 21 C. J. page 368, § 378.

The-'bill in this cause was verified by affidavit ■ of complainant clearly deposing that she is a creditor of the estate; indeed, a judgment creditor.

The right of removal by original bill, in such case, is matter of right; does not depend on averment or proof that the estate can be better administered in equity. Hence, the further statement of affiant that she believed this to be true, as in a statutory petition for removal did not detract from the sufficiency of the verification.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. ■ J., and- GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lynne v. Irwin, 147 So. 385, 226 Ala. 463, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 335 (Ala. 1933).

147 So. 385 (Lynne v. Irwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Kelly
8 So. 2d 855 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1942)
Rudulph v. Hodo
153 So. 238 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934)
Irwin v. Irwin
148 So. 846 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)