Lynn Workingmen's Aid Ass'n v. City of Lynn

136 Mass. 283, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 83
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 3, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 136 Mass. 283 (Lynn Workingmen's Aid Ass'n v. City of Lynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynn Workingmen's Aid Ass'n v. City of Lynn, 136 Mass. 283, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 83 (Mass. 1884).

Opinion

Colburn, J.

Without determining the question whether the plaintiff can be considered a benevolent or charitable institution, within the meaning of the Gen. Sts. c. 11, § 5, cl. 3, we are of opinion that, if this question should be decided in the affirmative, its real estate was not occupied by it, or its officers, for the purposes for which it was incorporated, so as to be exempt from taxation under the provisions of that statute.

The real estate assessed was held by the plaintiff for the purpose of sale. It is not all the real estate owned by a corporation included in the statute that is exempt, but only such as is occupied in a particular way. In the Rev. Sts. c. 7, § 5, cl. 2, relating to this subject, the language used is “ shall actually be occupied by them.” The word “ actually ” was omitted in the General Statutes, without any apparent intention of changing the meaning. The word “occupied” in the statute is not used in the general sense in which a corporation or individual may be said to occupy their real estate when it is not occupied by any one else, but in the sense in which an incorporated college, academy, hospital, or like institution, occupies its college, academy, or hospital, and the lands and buildings connected therewith. That this was the intention of the Legislature is shown by the St. of 1878, c. 214, passed probably in consequence of the decision in Trinity [286]*286Church v. Boston, 118 Mass. 164, which provides that “ the real estate belonging to such institutions as are mentioned in the third division of section five of chapter eleven of the General Statutes, purchased with a view of removal thereto, shall not be exempt from taxation for a longer period than two years until such removal takes place.”

The plaintiff is essentially a land company, and, although it is to make no profits, and is required to sell its houses and lots on such terms as may in some sense be deemed benevolent or charitable, it did not occupy the real estate assessed so as to entitle it to exemption from taxation. Chapel of the Good Shepherd v. Boston, 120 Mass. 212.

Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wheaton College v. Inhabitants of Norton
232 Mass. 141 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1919)
Trustees of Phillips Academy v. Inhabitants of Andover
48 L.R.A. 550 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Suffolk Savings Bank
20 N.E. 331 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 Mass. 283, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynn-workingmens-aid-assn-v-city-of-lynn-mass-1884.