Lynn v. United States

172 F.2d 764, 84 U.S. App. D.C. 306, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2770
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 1949
DocketNo. 9879
StatusPublished

This text of 172 F.2d 764 (Lynn v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynn v. United States, 172 F.2d 764, 84 U.S. App. D.C. 306, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2770 (D.C. Cir. 1949).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a conviction of assault with intent to rape. Appellant disputes the sufficiency of the evidence. But from what he said and did during the violent assault he committed upon a woman he did not know, we think it may well be regarded as clear beyond a reasonable doubt that he intended to commit rape. Cf. Robinson v. United States, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 63, 136 F.2d 283. The Hammond case (Hammond v. United States), 75 U.S.App.D.C. 397, 127 F.2d 752, in which the defendant was well acquainted with the prosecuting witness and used no violence, throws no doubt upon the sufficiency of the present evidence. The possibility that appellant fell too far short of success to be conventionally regarded as guilty of attempt to rape is immaterial, like the fact that rape itself was not committed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hammond v. United States
127 F.2d 752 (D.C. Circuit, 1942)
Robinson v. United States
136 F.2d 283 (D.C. Circuit, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 F.2d 764, 84 U.S. App. D.C. 306, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynn-v-united-states-cadc-1949.