Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lynn v. State

Lynn v. State

537 So. 2d 691, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 279, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 384, 1989 WL 5676
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 1989
DocketNo. 88-302
StatusPublished

This text of 537 So. 2d 691 (Lynn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynn v. State, 537 So. 2d 691, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 279, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 384, 1989 WL 5676 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Public Defender filed an Anders1 brief and the appellant filed a short pro se brief.

At sentencing of the defendant in the instant case (trial court case #87-4695), the court announced that the sentences imposed were to run concurrent with the sentence imposed in a previous case (trial [692]*692court case # 87-2255). However, the written sentence omits such provision for concurrency. On remand, the trial court shall amend to provide for such concurrency.

We affirm the judgments and sentences but remand for the purpose stated above.

SMITH, C.J., and ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
537 So. 2d 691, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 279, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 384, 1989 WL 5676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynn-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.