Lynn v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Lynn v. State

92 So. 239, 18 Ala. App. 422, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 110

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 10, 1922·No. 6 Div. 854.·Published

Opinions

[423] SAMFORD, J.

[1,2] Since the opinion in the Horn Case, 17 Ala. App. 419, 84 South. 883, the quarantine laws have been changed, and defendant is being prosecuted under section 5 of Acts 1919, p. 29, approved February 7, 1919. The affidavit follows the language of the statute and is sufficient to charge the offense condemned by the statute. Besides, the record fails to show any ruling on the demurrers, and hence we cannot review them here.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[423] SAMFORD, J.

[1,2] Since the opinion in the Horn Case, 17 Ala. App. 419, 84 South. 883, the quarantine laws have been changed, and defendant is being prosecuted under section 5 of Acts 1919, p. 29, approved February 7, 1919. The affidavit follows the language of the statute and is sufficient to charge the offense condemned by the statute. Besides, the record fails to show any ruling on the demurrers, and hence we cannot review them here.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Lynn v. State, 92 So. 239, 18 Ala. App. 422, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 110 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

92 So. 239 (Lynn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Footnotes

Related