Lynn v. State

92 So. 239, 18 Ala. App. 422, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 110
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 10, 1922
Docket6 Div. 854.
StatusPublished

This text of 92 So. 239 (Lynn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynn v. State, 92 So. 239, 18 Ala. App. 422, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 110 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinions

[423]*423SAMFORD, J.

[1,2] Since the opinion in the Horn Case, 17 Ala. App. 419, 84 South. 883, the quarantine laws have been changed, and defendant is being prosecuted under section 5 of Acts 1919, p. 29, approved February 7, 1919. The affidavit follows the language of the statute and is sufficient to charge the offense condemned by the statute. Besides, the record fails to show any ruling on the demurrers, and hence we cannot review them here.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horn v. State
84 So. 883 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 So. 239, 18 Ala. App. 422, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynn-v-state-alactapp-1922.