Lynn & Cahill, LLP v. Witkin

101 A.D.3d 515, 954 N.Y.2d 879

This text of 101 A.D.3d 515 (Lynn & Cahill, LLP v. Witkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynn & Cahill, LLP v. Witkin, 101 A.D.3d 515, 954 N.Y.2d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

In response to plaintiffs motion for a default judgment, defendant failed to provide a reasonable excuse for failing to file an answer (see e.g. Toure v Harrison, 6 AD3d 270, 271 [1st Dept 2004]). Rather, the record suggests that defendant’s inaction constituted a tactical decision on the part of herself and counsel. Nor did defendant demonstrate a meritorious defense to the action.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toure v. Harrison
6 A.D.3d 270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.3d 515, 954 N.Y.2d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynn-cahill-llp-v-witkin-nyappdiv-2012.