Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 16, 2024·No. 23-1935·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-1935 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 10/16/2024

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

LYNK LABS, INC., Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellee ______________________

2023-1935 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021- 01347. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

STEPHEN MCBRIDE, Carmichael Ip, Tysons, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES CARMICHAEL, STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, MINGHUI YANG.

IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is Case: 23-1935 Document: 45 Page: 2 Filed: 10/16/2024

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and STARK, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 16, 2024 Date

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., (Fed. Cir. 2024).

Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.