Lynette Chapman v. The Higbee Company, Doing Business as Dillard Department Stores, Inc.

270 F.3d 297, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22598, 2001 WL 1301202
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 17, 2001
Docket99-3970
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 270 F.3d 297 (Lynette Chapman v. The Higbee Company, Doing Business as Dillard Department Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynette Chapman v. The Higbee Company, Doing Business as Dillard Department Stores, Inc., 270 F.3d 297, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22598, 2001 WL 1301202 (6th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as directed by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 F.3d 297, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22598, 2001 WL 1301202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynette-chapman-v-the-higbee-company-doing-business-as-dillard-department-ca6-2001.