Lynette Chapman v. The Higbee Company, Doing Business as Dillard Department Stores, Inc.

270 F.3d 297, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22598, 2001 WL 1301202
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 17, 2001·No. 99-3970·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as directed by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lynette Chapman v. The Higbee Company, Doing Business as Dillard Department Stores, Inc., 270 F.3d 297, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22598, 2001 WL 1301202 (6th Cir. 2001).

270 F.3d 297 (Lynette Chapman v. The Higbee Company, Doing Business as Dillard Department Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related