Lynette Allgood v. The Elyria United Methodist Home

Sixth Circuit

Lynette Allgood v. The Elyria United Methodist Home

913 F.2d 1159, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16749, 1990 WL 134992

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedAugust 23, 1990

Docket89-3476

StatusPublished

This text of 913 F.2d 1159 (Lynette Allgood v. The Elyria United Methodist Home) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lynette Allgood v. The Elyria United Methodist Home, 913 F.2d 1159, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16749, 1990 WL 134992 (6th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The court having received two petitions for rehearing en banc, and the petitions having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and no judge of this court having requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, the petitions for rehearing have been referred to the original hearing panel.

Upon consideration of the appellees’ petitions for rehearing en banc, the panel believes that the petitions have merit as to one point, and should be granted to that extent. In Minority Employees v. Tenn. Dept. of Emp. Sec., 901 F.2d 1327, 1336 (6th Cir.1990) (en banc), our court held that the holding that all appellants must be named in a notice of appeal was to be applied retroactively. The notice of appeal in this case cannot be distinguished from the notice in Minority Employees.

Accordingly, the appellees’ motions for rehearing en banc are granted to the extent that the appeal is dismissed as to all appellants except the named appellant Lynette Allgood.

In all other respects the petitions are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The court having received two petitions for rehearing en banc, and the petitions having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and no judge of this court having requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, the petitions for rehearing have been referred to the original hearing panel.

Upon consideration of the appellees’ petitions for rehearing en banc, the panel believes that the petitions have merit as to one point, and should be granted to that extent. In Minority Employees v. Tenn. Dept. of Emp. Sec., 901 F.2d 1327, 1336 (6th Cir.1990) (en banc), our court held that the holding that all appellants must be named in a notice of appeal was to be applied retroactively. The notice of appeal in this case cannot be distinguished from the notice in Minority Employees.

Accordingly, the appellees’ motions for rehearing en banc are granted to the extent that the appeal is dismissed as to all appellants except the named appellant Lynette Allgood.

In all other respects the petitions are denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

913 F.2d 1159, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16749, 1990 WL 134992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynette-allgood-v-the-elyria-united-methodist-home-ca6-1990.