Lyness v. Fessenden Light & Power Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Lyness v. Fessenden Light & Power Co.

171 N.W. 827, 42 N.D. 10, 1919 N.D. LEXIS 107

DecidedMarch 15, 1919

StatusPublished

This text of 171 N.W. 827 (Lyness v. Fessenden Light & Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lyness v. Fessenden Light & Power Co., 171 N.W. 827, 42 N.D. 10, 1919 N.D. LEXIS 107 (N.D. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Robinson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for $220.47, including costs, and from an order denying a motion for judgment contrary to the verdict. The claim is for dray work done at the request of Baldwin, and for the use and benefit of himself and the defendant. Baldwin had arranged with the defendant to construct for its operation a power line, and as a part of the arrangement it was to furnish the materials. The poles were shipped by rail to Fessenden and were billed to “the Fessenden Light & Power Company.” The dray age work of the plaintiff was to get from the railroad depot and yards the material shipped to the defendant and to distribute the same along the line, so in reality the building of the line was a joint venture between Baldwin and the defendant. When the work was done Baldwin made to the company a bill of sale for his interest in the line and his interest in contracts with some ten persons, who each agreed to pay and contribute a nice sum of the expense of the line, and defendant assumed and agreed [12]*12to pay for the work of constructing the line. It was not merely an agreement to pay the debt of another. The construction of the line waa a joint enterprise; the work of distributing the poles and materials waa done aa much for the benefit of the company as for the benefit of Baldwin. Indeed, the company was the real and principal party and the only party that haa enjoyed, and continues to enjoy the benefit of the plaintiff’s work. The verdict and judgment is clearly right.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for $220.47, including costs, and from an order denying a motion for judgment contrary to the verdict. The claim is for dray work done at the request of Baldwin, and for the use and benefit of himself and the defendant. Baldwin had arranged with the defendant to construct for its operation a power line, and as a part of the arrangement it was to furnish the materials. The poles were shipped by rail to Fessenden and were billed to “the Fessenden Light & Power Company.” The dray age work of the plaintiff was to get from the railroad depot and yards the material shipped to the defendant and to distribute the same along the line, so in reality the building of the line was a joint venture between Baldwin and the defendant. When the work was done Baldwin made to the company a bill of sale for his interest in the line and his interest in contracts with some ten persons, who each agreed to pay and contribute a nice sum of the expense of the line, and defendant assumed and agreed [12]*12to pay for the work of constructing the line. It was not merely an agreement to pay the debt of another. The construction of the line waa a joint enterprise; the work of distributing the poles and materials waa done aa much for the benefit of the company as for the benefit of Baldwin. Indeed, the company was the real and principal party and the only party that haa enjoyed, and continues to enjoy the benefit of the plaintiff’s work. The verdict and judgment is clearly right.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 N.W. 827, 42 N.D. 10, 1919 N.D. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyness-v-fessenden-light-power-co-nd-1919.