Lynes v. Hall

First Circuit

Lynes v. Hall

48 F. App'x 800

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided October 23, 2002·No. 01-2494·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Thomas Lynes appeals a district court order that dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs on appeal, we agree that the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s decision was neither “contrary to” nor an “unreasonable application” of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), and its progeny. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Thomas Lynes appeals a district court order that dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs on appeal, we agree that the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s decision was neither “contrary to” nor an “unreasonable application” of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), and its progeny. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).

Lynes v. Hall, 48 F. App'x 800 (1st Cir. 2002).

Pincite

48 F. App'x 800 (Lynes v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related