Lynes v. Hall

First Circuit

Lynes v. Hall

48 F. App'x 800

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedOctober 23, 2002

Docket01-2494

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F. App'x 800 (Lynes v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lynes v. Hall, 48 F. App'x 800 (1st Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Thomas Lynes appeals a district court order that dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs on appeal, we agree that the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s decision was neither “contrary to” nor an “unreasonable application” of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), and its progeny. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Thomas Lynes appeals a district court order that dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs on appeal, we agree that the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s decision was neither “contrary to” nor an “unreasonable application” of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), and its progeny. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F. App'x 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynes-v-hall-ca1-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack