Lynes & Lynes v. Schooley & Hoyt

7 Cow. 516
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1827
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 Cow. 516 (Lynes & Lynes v. Schooley & Hoyt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynes & Lynes v. Schooley & Hoyt, 7 Cow. 516 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

Opinion

Curia.

It is true, a plea or notice sent by mail, the re* [517]*517ceipt of which is not denied, will save a default. But this *notice was not sent by mail. The mere belief that the notice was received is not sfficient. Probable grounds for the belief must be shown; and we then put the opposite ■attorney to deny the receipt. This practice should not be extended. When a party comes to set aside a default for irregularity, he should be holden to proof at least that he sent his papers in the ordinary course. This notice was not so sent. It was served on the agent, with whom there was no duty or undertaking to transmit it to his principal. He might have treated it as waste paper. The attorney might as well rely on his belief, founded on a chance con•veyance by a stranger. The motion cannot be granted for irregularity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wiggin v. Wiggin
43 N.H. 561 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1862)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Cow. 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynes-lynes-v-schooley-hoyt-nysupct-1827.