Lyndall Motor Truck Co. v. Langinger
75 Pa. Super. 317, 1921 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5
Opinion
The opinion filed in the court below in entering judgment in favor of the defendant fully sustains the correctness of the conclusion reached. The statement filed does not sufficiently show a cause of action, and a declaration of ability to perform is not a promise to perform.
For the reasons given by the court below, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lyndall Motor Truck Co. v. Langinger, 75 Pa. Super. 317, 1921 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5 (Pa. Ct. App. 1921).
75 Pa. Super. 317 (Lyndall Motor Truck Co. v. Langinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seiple v. Long
10 Pa. D. & C. 41 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)