Home/Supreme Court/Lynd v. United States

Lynd v. United States

371 U.S. 893, 83 S. Ct. 187, 9 L. Ed. 2d 125, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 288
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 5, 1962
DocketNo. 355
StatusPublished
Cited by99 cases

This text of 371 U.S. 893 (Lynd v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynd v. United States, 371 U.S. 893, 83 S. Ct. 187, 9 L. Ed. 2d 125, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 288 (1962).

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mikell
163 F. Supp. 2d 720 (E.D. Michigan, 2001)
Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc. United General Marketing, Inc., Classic Sales, Inc., Charles W. Jones and Robert E. Lee, Defendants-Crossclaim- General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim- Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, Iii, William J. Purvis, William L. Sikkelee and Consolidated Trading Co., Joseph Lee Smith, Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, United States of America, Movants. Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, William J. Purvis and William L. Sikkelee, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, United States of America, Movants
14 F.3d 1507 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)
Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,609 in Re Public Service Company of New Hampshire, Debtor. Martin Rochman v. Northeast Utilities Service Group
963 F.2d 469 (First Circuit, 1992)
Rochman v. Northeast Utilities Service Group (In re Public Service Co. of New Hampshire)
963 F.2d 469 (First Circuit, 1992)
Coal Resources, Inc. v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.
954 F.2d 1263 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)
Jose Rolo, Rosa Rolo, Dr. William Tenerelli v. General Development Corporation, Gdv Financial, Inc., David F. Brown, Robert F. Ehrling, the Home Insurance Company, the Federal Mortgage Loan Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, Carteret Mortgage Corp., the Citizens and Southern National Bank, Southeast Bank, N.A., Citizens and Southern Trust Company (Florida) National Association, Ambase Corporation, Chase Federal Savings & Loan Association, Secor National Bank, Capital Bank, John Does, 1-15, City Investing Company Liquidating Trust, Carteret Bancorp, Inc., Carteret Savings Bank, Fa, George T. Scharffenberger, Marshall Manley, Edwin I. Hatch, Eben W. Pyne, Reubin O'd. Askew, Howard L. Clark, Jr., Charles J. Simons, Peter R. Brinckerhoff, Cravath, Swaine, David G. Ormsby, Painewebber Incorporated, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, the Prudential Insurance Company of America, National Bank of Canada, Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., First National Bank of Boston, Federal National Mortgage Association, Chase Federal Bank, Fsb, Secor Bank, Fsb, Oxford First Corp., the Oxford Finance Companies, Inc., Stanchart Business Credit, Inc., Harbor Federal Savings and Loan Association, Greyhound Financial Corporation, Lloyds Bank Plc, John Does 1-10. Jose Rolo, Rosa Rolo, Dr. William Tenerelli v. General Development Corporation, Gdv Financial, Inc., David F. Brown, Robert F. Ehrling, the Home Insurance Company, the Federal Mortgage Loan Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, Carteret Mortgage Corp., the Citizens and Southern National Bank, Southeast Bank, N.A., Citizens and Southern Trust Company (Florida) National Association, Ambase Corporation, Chase Federal Savings & Loan Association, Secor National Bank, Capital Bank, John Does, 1-15, Honorable Harold A. Ackerman, United States District Judge, Nominal
949 F.2d 695 (First Circuit, 1991)
Matson Plastering Co. v. Plasterers & Shophands Local No. 66
852 F.2d 1200 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Matson Plastering Company, Inc. v. Plasterers And Shophands Local No. 66
852 F.2d 1200 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Frank Runnels (86-1923) and Arnold Shapero (86-1922)
833 F.2d 1183 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)
Overton v. City of Austin
748 F.2d 941 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)
Margaret P. Katch, as Independent Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard P. Katch, Deceased v. Speidel, Division of Textron, Inc.
746 F.2d 1136 (Sixth Circuit, 1984)
State v. Haberski
449 A.2d 373 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1982)
Charles D. McDonald v. Charles M. Bennett and James v. Belvedere, Charles M. Bennett v. Charles D. McDonald
674 F.2d 1080 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Dorfman
532 F. Supp. 1118 (N.D. Illinois, 1981)
United States v. Carmen J. Civella
666 F.2d 1122 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)
26 Fair empl.prac.cas. 870, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,025 Fred Roberts v. St. Regis Paper Company, Etc.
653 F.2d 166 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Gordon Gould and Refac International, Limited, Gordon Gould v. Control Laser Corp., and Holobeam Laser Corp.
650 F.2d 617 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Hoots v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
639 F.2d 972 (Third Circuit, 1981)
Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Local Union No. 137, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America
623 F.2d 1354 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
Lena Holloway Watson v. Commissioners Court of Harrison County
616 F.2d 105 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 U.S. 893, 83 S. Ct. 187, 9 L. Ed. 2d 125, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynd-v-united-states-scotus-1962.