Lynch v. United Distributors, Inc.
This text of 915 So. 2d 274 (Lynch v. United Distributors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Geoffrey LYNCH, Appellant,
v.
UNITED DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Ronald J. Zeller of Zeller & Associates, L.L.C., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Sally Still and Christine D. Hanley of Christine D. Hanley & Associates, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
SHAHOOD, J.
We reverse the order dismissing appellant's second amended complaint for lack of prosecution pursuant to rule 1.420(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, because there was, on the face of the record, activity within the one-year period, i.e., appellant's notice of compliance with discovery. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420; Wilson v. Salamon, 30 Fla. L. Weekly S701, ___ So.2d ___, 2005 WL 2663432 (Fla. Oct. 20, 2005).
Reversed and Remanded.
STEVENSON, C.J., and POLEN, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
915 So. 2d 274, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19613, 2005 WL 3299713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-united-distributors-inc-fladistctapp-2005.