Lynch v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Lynch v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.

184 F. App'x 667

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 16, 2006

DocketNo. 04-35467

StatusPublished

This text of 184 F. App'x 667 (Lynch v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lynch v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc., 184 F. App'x 667 (9th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

*

Appellant Michael Lynch appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from judgment and a new trial under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2), (3) and (6), as well as the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. The parties are familiar with the facts and procedural history.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Rule 60(b)(3) motion when it found that the additional evidence proffered was insufficient to reopen the judgment. The law of the case governs the indirect damages claim and we see no reason to disturb it. See Lynch v. Trendwest Resorts Inc., 64 Fed.Appx. 44 (9th Cir .2003).

The claims under Rules 60(b)(2) and (6) were waived because they were not argued in the opening brief.

Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI