Lynch v. Third Avenue Railroad

27 Jones & S. 71, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 431
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedFebruary 4, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Jones & S. 71 (Lynch v. Third Avenue Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynch v. Third Avenue Railroad, 27 Jones & S. 71, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 431 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Opinions

By the Court.—Freedman, J.

The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, in attempting to get on board of one of the cars of the defendant. Upon the testimony of the plaintiff the case was one for the jury, and the trial judge properly refused to dismiss the complaint or to direct a verdict. There is no exception to the charge, or to any refusal to charge otherwise. None of the exceptions taken to the admission or exclusion of evidence is, under all the circumstances, of sufficient importance to call for reversal, and upon the whole case no valid reason appears for disturbing the verdict.

The judgment and order should be affirmed with costs.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gumb v. Twenty-Third Street Railway Co.
21 N.E. 993 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Armstrong v. Percy
5 Wend. 535 (New York Supreme Court, 1830)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Jones & S. 71, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-third-avenue-railroad-nysuperctnyc-1891.