Lynch v. State of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Lynch v. State of Arizona

40 P.2d 1119, 45 Ariz. 209, 1935 Ariz. LEXIS 222

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 11, 1935

DocketCriminal No. 817.

StatusPublished

This text of 40 P.2d 1119 (Lynch v. State of Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lynch v. State of Arizona, 40 P.2d 1119, 45 Ariz. 209, 1935 Ariz. LEXIS 222 (Ark. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

William Lynch was informed against by the county attorney of Pima county for the crime of manslaughter. The case was tried to a jury which rendered a verdict of guilty, and, after the defendant was duly sentenced, this appeal was taken. No reporter's transcript was filed, nor did defendant think it worth while to file a brief suggesting wherein the trial court had erred. Notwithstanding this, we have examined the case for fundamental error. The information states a public offense, the jury found the defendant guilty thereof, and he was duly sentenced according to law. Nothing appears in the record showing that he did not have a fair and impartial trial.

The judgment is therefore affirmed. *Page 210

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Lynch was informed against by the county attorney of Pima county for the crime of manslaughter. The case was tried to a jury which rendered a verdict of guilty, and, after the defendant was duly sentenced, this appeal was taken. No reporter's transcript was filed, nor did defendant think it worth while to file a brief suggesting wherein the trial court had erred. Notwithstanding this, we have examined the case for fundamental error. The information states a public offense, the jury found the defendant guilty thereof, and he was duly sentenced according to law. Nothing appears in the record showing that he did not have a fair and impartial trial.

The judgment is therefore affirmed. *Page 210

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 P.2d 1119, 45 Ariz. 209, 1935 Ariz. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-state-of-arizona-ariz-1935.