Lynch v. State

881 So. 2d 93, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12469, 2004 WL 1877362
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 24, 2004·No. No. 1D03-1485·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ulysses Lynch, appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to correct sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), contending that his prior conviction for possession of cocaine within five years of his instant conviction cannot constitute a qualifying offense pursuant to section 775.084(l)(a)(2)(b) and (l)(a)(3), Florida Statutes (2002), when read in pari mate-ria. We affirm the trial court’s conclusion that this “is not provided in the statute and should not be read into the statute as a matter of statutory construction.” See Edwards v. State, 743 So.2d 76 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (“Nothing in the statute ... prohibits sentencing a defendant as a habitual felony offender when the current offense was committed within five years of release from prison for a conviction for [94] purchase or possession of a controlled substance in violation of 893.13.”).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lynch v. State, 881 So. 2d 93, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12469, 2004 WL 1877362 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

881 So. 2d 93 (Lynch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PEDRO ARMANDO WALTON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
RUBIN JONES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Baker v. State
197 So. 3d 629 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Harris v. State
197 So. 3d 630 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Stewart v. State
66 So. 3d 1086 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Pearson v. State
888 So. 2d 110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)