Lynch v. State

659 So. 2d 1358, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9535, 1995 WL 525673
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 8, 1995
DocketNo. 94-1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 659 So. 2d 1358 (Lynch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynch v. State, 659 So. 2d 1358, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9535, 1995 WL 525673 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

While William Larry Lynch was serving three probationary sentences, he committed a new offense. His probation sentences were vacated and he was sentenced to five years’ incarceration concurrent on each case. Because of multiple violations of these probation sentences, the sentences on these cases were appropriate.

However, on the new offense, scored on a new scoresheet showing a maximum sentence of 32.25 months, Lynch was also sentenced to five years incarceration without written reasons justifying the departure. We reverse the sentence on the 1994 conviction and remand for resentencing within the appropriate range. See Heath v. State, 656 So.2d 527 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Allen v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D1653, — So.2d — [1995 WL 421872] (Fla. 3d DCA July 19, 1995).

REVERSED for resentencing.

PETERSON, C.J., and W. SHARP, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caldwell v. State
659 So. 2d 1358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
659 So. 2d 1358, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9535, 1995 WL 525673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.