Lynch v. State
This text of 155 So. 99 (Lynch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In this case this Court finds itself unable to consider the arguments' made in the brief of plaintiff in error as to the insufficiency of the information upon which the conviction appealed from was had, because there is before this Court no properly prepared transcript of the record filed here as required by the law and rules of this Court. While the brief of the Attorney General in effect concedes the insufficiency of the count of the information upon which plaintiff in error was sentenced, yet without something more than a certified copy of the information and judgment (which is all that is before us) this Court is without jurisdiction to reverse the judgment, even though it may appear to be erroneous.
The writ of error is accordingly dismissed.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 So. 99, 114 Fla. 839, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-state-fla-1934.