Lynch v. Skelly

Connecticut Superior Court

Lynch v. Skelly

17 Conn. Super. Ct. 225, 17 Conn. Supp. 225, 1951 Conn. Super. LEXIS 22

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedApril 10, 1951

DocketFile 18048

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Conn. Super. Ct. 225 (Lynch v. Skelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lynch v. Skelly, 17 Conn. Super. Ct. 225, 17 Conn. Supp. 225, 1951 Conn. Super. LEXIS 22 (Colo. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

MURPHY, J.

The plaintiff has sued to recover certain moneys transferred by the decedent in his lifetime to one of the defendants and by her distributed with the other defendants after his death.

*226 No inventory was filed in the Probate Court before suit was instituted and the claim upon which recovery is sought was not inventoried. The plaintiff has admitted these facts in his answer to the second and third special defenses of the defendants.

“In case the estate belonged to the intestate, the administrator could not prosecute his claim . . . until it was inventoried.” Gold’s Appeal, Kirby 100, 103. “Such inventory is the basis and foundation upon which all the other proceedings prescribed by statute, or requisite to be had, rest and depend.” Frisbie v. Preston, 67 Conn. 448, 455.

It is a condition precedent to the institution of suit by an administrator that he file an inventory of the estate with the Probate Court and that it include the claim upon which suit is instituted.

Judgment will be entered for the defendants upon the pleadings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI