Lynch v. Security Indemnity Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lynch v. Security Indemnity Insurance

302 A.D.2d 295, 754 N.Y.S.2d 542, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1711

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 2003·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered February 15, 2002, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment declaring that defendant insurer was obligated to pay plaintiff no-fault benefits from June 8, 2001, the date when defendant’s denial of such benefits became effective, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court, in denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, properly determined that based on the conflicting [296] medical evidence, there was a question of fact as to whether further accident-related treatment was necessary (see Wagner v Baird, 208 AD2d 1087). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered February 15, 2002, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment declaring that defendant insurer was obligated to pay plaintiff no-fault benefits from June 8, 2001, the date when defendant’s denial of such benefits became effective, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court, in denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, properly determined that based on the conflicting [296] medical evidence, there was a question of fact as to whether further accident-related treatment was necessary (see Wagner v Baird, 208 AD2d 1087). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Lynch v. Security Indemnity Insurance, 302 A.D.2d 295, 754 N.Y.S.2d 542, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

302 A.D.2d 295 (Lynch v. Security Indemnity Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related