Lynch v. Potter
This text of 52 F. App'x 415 (Lynch v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM1
John W. Lynch appeals pro se the district court’s judgment in favor of the Postmaster General in his employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo summary judgment. Aragon v. Republic Silver State Disposal, Inc., 292 F.3d 654, 659 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.
The district court properly granted defendant summary judgment because Lynch did not present evidence to demonstrate that the Postal Service’s legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons for its employment actions were a pretext for discrimination. See id. at 664. Lynch’s unsupported accusation that witnesses committed perjury does not create a triable issue. See Robinson v. Adams, 847 F.2d 1315, 1317 (9th Cir.1988).
Lynch’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.
Lynch’s motion for “production of documents and extension of time” received July 24, 2002 is DENIED. Lynch’s “motion to file leave additional/correction reply to informal rebuttal to defendants brief’ received on September 23, 2002 is construed as a motion to supplement the record and is GRANTED. The Clerk shah file the motion received on September 23, 2002, and the documents attached thereto are included in the record on appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F. App'x 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-potter-ca9-2002.