Lynch v. Ponca City

1916 OK 503, 157 P. 351, 57 Okla. 494, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 545
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 2, 1916·No. 6214·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

EITTENHOUSE, C.

This cause was brought to restrain the city of Ponca City, Okla., from making certain street improvements. A trial was had' upon a stipulation, admitting the allegations of the petition, and resulted in a judgment for the city. The petition in error contained the following alleged assignment' of error:

“The said court erred in making an order denying plaintiff in error’s application for a temporary restraining order.”

There is nothing in this alleged assignment of error from which the court can ascertain wherein the trial .court *495 committed error. It is too general and indefinite to present any question to this court for review. Standard Stone Co. v. Greer et al., 52 Okla. 595, 153 Pac. 640; Willet v. Johnson, 13 Okla. 563, 76 Pac. 174; Turner v. First Nat. Bank, 40 Okla. 498, 139 Pac. 703; Jones v. Lee, 43 Okla. 257, 142 Pac. 996; Johnson v. Johnson, 43 Okla. 582, 143 Pac. 670.

The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lynch v. Ponca City, 1916 OK 503, 157 P. 351, 57 Okla. 494, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 545 (Okla. 1916).

1916 OK 503 (Lynch v. Ponca City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Satterwhite v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
1935 OK 1170 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)