Lynch v. Ponca City
This text of 1916 OK 503 (Lynch v. Ponca City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This cause was brought to restrain the city of Ponca City, Okla., from making certain street improvements. A trial was had' upon a stipulation, admitting the allegations of the petition, and resulted in a judgment for the city. The petition in error contained the following alleged assignment' of error:
“The said court erred in making an order denying plaintiff in error’s application for a temporary restraining order.”
There is nothing in this alleged assignment of error from which the court can ascertain wherein the trial .court *495 committed error. It is too general and indefinite to present any question to this court for review. Standard Stone Co. v. Greer et al., 52 Okla. 595, 153 Pac. 640; Willet v. Johnson, 13 Okla. 563, 76 Pac. 174; Turner v. First Nat. Bank, 40 Okla. 498, 139 Pac. 703; Jones v. Lee, 43 Okla. 257, 142 Pac. 996; Johnson v. Johnson, 43 Okla. 582, 143 Pac. 670.
The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1916 OK 503, 157 P. 351, 57 Okla. 494, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-ponca-city-okla-1916.