Lynch v. Pace
This text of 40 Ga. 173 (Lynch v. Pace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Inasmuch as the applicant for a homestead did not allege, in his application therefor, that he was “ the head of a family, or guardian, or trustee of a family of minor children,” the demurrer thereto should have been sustained by the Court below.
When an appeal is taken to the Superior Court, from the judgment of the Ordinary, allowing or refusing a homestead, as provided by the Act of 1868, the whole case is brought up by the appeal, and either party may, in the appellate Court, raise any objections, or make any motion in relation thereto, authorized by law, as in other appeal cases from the Court of Ordinary.
Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 Ga. 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-pace-ga-1869.