Lynch v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

172 A.D. 934, 156 N.Y.S. 1131

This text of 172 A.D. 934 (Lynch v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynch v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 172 A.D. 934, 156 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote, J., who dissented upon the ground that the court erred in charging the jury in effect that they might find the shipments were diverted and in refusing to charge as matter of law that there was no diversion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A.D. 934, 156 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1916.