Lynch v. Murray

21 How. Pr. 154
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 21 How. Pr. 154 (Lynch v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynch v. Murray, 21 How. Pr. 154 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1860).

Opinion

Leonard, Justice.

When a party relies upon any breaches of an agreement as the foundation of an action, he must set forth in his pleading sufficient of the agreement to make it appear to the court that the breaches complained of do actually exist, and to what extent.

The tenth, and some other sections of the answer, set up new matter as an affirmative defence.

The practice requires the pleader to specify each separate cause of action or defence, and the answer is quite defective in this respect.

Nor are there any clauses of the contract alleged in any of the pleadings that require McGuire and Evans to do the particular work which the defendant complains that they have not done.

The answer must be made more definite and certain in these respects.

The plaintiff is also entitled to the bill of particulars required.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 How. Pr. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-murray-nysupct-1860.