Lynch v. Murphy
165 A.D. 903
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., dissented on the ground that the contract sued on was not in writing and was void under the Statute of Frauds.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lynch v. Murphy, 165 A.D. 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
165 A.D. 903 (Lynch v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goebbel v. Gross
151 Misc. 512 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1934)