Lynch v. Lawson

8 Nev. 162
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Whitman, C. J.:

Respondent claimed under no strict title, and never had any such possession as. would warrant recovery even as against at respasser. The law in this State is well settled and needs no iteration upon this point. Robinson v. The Imperial Silver Mining Company, 5 Nev. 44.

Again, the evidence of the surveyors (conceding for this, decision that it was properly admitted) shows, if it shows any thing., that appellant is within the lines of her own lot as originally run, and 'no authority appears for a change. The judgment and order denying a new trial are reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lynch v. Lawson, 8 Nev. 162 (Neb. 1873).

8 Nev. 162 (Lynch v. Lawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapman v. Justice Court of Tonopah Township
29 Nev. 154 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1906)