Lynch v. Havird

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Lynch v. Havird

541 S.E.2d 241, 343 S.C. 485, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 14

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 10, 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, [486]*486Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Havird, 335 S.C. 642, 518 S.E.2d 48 (Ct.App.1999). The parties have now filed a motion requesting that this Court dismiss the matter and remit it to the trial court for entry of dismissal with prejudice, with each party bearing their own costs.

The motion to dismiss is granted. See Rule 231(b), SCACR. Because this case concerns a novel issue involving a split in jurisdictions, the Court of Appeals’ opinion is vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ James E. Moore, Acting C.J. /s/ John H. Waller, Jr„ J. /s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J. /s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J. TOAL, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, [486]*486Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Havird, 335 S.C. 642, 518 S.E.2d 48 (Ct.App.1999). The parties have now filed a motion requesting that this Court dismiss the matter and remit it to the trial court for entry of dismissal with prejudice, with each party bearing their own costs.

The motion to dismiss is granted. See Rule 231(b), SCACR. Because this case concerns a novel issue involving a split in jurisdictions, the Court of Appeals’ opinion is vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ James E. Moore, Acting C.J. /s/ John H. Waller, Jr„ J. /s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J. /s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J. TOAL, C. J., not participating.

Lynch v. Havird, 541 S.E.2d 241, 343 S.C. 485, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 14 (S.C. 2001).

Pincite

541 S.E.2d 241 (Lynch v. Havird) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related