Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.

661 A.2d 98, 234 Conn. 919

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJuly 17, 1995

DocketSC 15298

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 661 A.2d 98 (Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc., 661 A.2d 98, 234 Conn. 919 (Colo. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition of Granby Holdings, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 846 (AC 11222), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Under the circumstances of this case, was the question of the burden of proof on the issue of mitigation of damages properly raised by the plaintiff Daniel Lynch in the trial court?

“2. Should this court reconsider the holding of Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, 185 Conn. 510 (1981), that the failure to raise a claim in a motion to set aside a verdict limits this court to plain error review of that claim?

“3. Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court employ the plain error doctrine to review on appeal the plaintiffs claim regarding the issue of the burden of proof on mitigation of damages?

“4. If the answer to 3. is yes, did the Appellate Court act properly in doing so?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI