Lynch v. Gardner

15 A.D.2d 562, 222 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6878
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 1961·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In our opinion, the Zoning Board of Appeals had no power to disregard or vary the thousand-foot limitation (Matter of Texas Co. v. Sinclair, 279 App, Div. 803, affd. 304 N, Y. 817; Matter of Board of Edue. [563] v. Wolf, 10 A D 2d 713). The distance requirement is a specific limitation on the power of the Zoning Board of Appeals in granting a special permit. It is contrary to the intention of the ordinance to permit the Zoning Board of Appeals to free itself from this express restriction on its power. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lynch v. Gardner, 15 A.D.2d 562, 222 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

15 A.D.2d 562 (Lynch v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

AA&L Associates, L. P. v. Casella
207 A.D.2d 1012 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Exxon Co. v. Bernardsville Bd. of Adj.
481 A.2d 1172 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
Gregorio v. Zoning Board of Appeals
232 A.2d 330 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1967)