Lynch v. Eustis

85 N.Y.S. 1063
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 7, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 85 N.Y.S. 1063 (Lynch v. Eustis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynch v. Eustis, 85 N.Y.S. 1063 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to set aside an order for substituted service of the summons and complaint upon him. But one question is presented, viz., is proof of residence within the state essential to confer jurisdiction ? We think it is. The order was made pursuant to section 435 [1064]*1064of the Code of Civil Procedure. The language of this section designating the status of the person upon whom its provisions may become operative is “upon a defendant residing within the state.” The record is barren of such proof. The court was within jurisdiction, and the order is void.

Order reversed, with $io costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 N.Y.S. 1063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-eustis-nyappterm-1904.