Lynch v. Crocker

18 S.C.L. 313
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedMay 15, 1831
StatusPublished

This text of 18 S.C.L. 313 (Lynch v. Crocker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynch v. Crocker, 18 S.C.L. 313 (S.C. Ct. App. 1831).

Opinion

O’Neall, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

[314]*314This case presents a mere question of practice; and as it has not been settled by any previous adjudication, the Court is at liberty to adopt any rule, which may be thought best calculated to afford cheap and speedy justice to the parties. This was the object,-to answer which, the process jurisdiction of the Court of law was created. In it the form of action has been in a great degree deprived of every thing like technical regularity. A statement of the cause of action truly, is all that is required. Upon bonds in the superior jurisdiction, the party may maintain debt on the penalty, or covenant on the condition. In the process jurisdiction, where the form of action is not regarded, we are at liberty to regard this as an action of covenant brought upon the condition. In this point of view, the demand was within the process jurisdiction, and the nonsuit was improperly ordered. The motion to set it aside, is therefore granted.

New trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 S.C.L. 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-crocker-scctapp-1831.