Lynch v. Brooklyn City Railroad

39 N.Y.S. 1127

This text of 39 N.Y.S. 1127 (Lynch v. Brooklyn City Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynch v. Brooklyn City Railroad, 39 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There are no good exceptions in this record. We cannot reverse the judgment on the ground that the verdict was against the evidence; for, even if the testimony of the South Carolina witness, which is so severely criticised, be left out of consideration, there is quite enough to sustain the finding of negligence. The case was one in which the jury might have found either way, according to their view of the credibility of the witnesses; and where there is such a conflict of proof their determination of the issues of fact must be allowed to stand, in the absence of legal error calling for a reversal. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 N.Y.S. 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-brooklyn-city-railroad-nyappdiv-1896.