Lynch v. Bogy

19 Mo. 170
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1853·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Gamble, Judge.

The plaintiff, in this action, claimed compensation for services rendered to Bogy, the defendant, as his agent, in effecting the sale of certain real estate belonging to the defendant. The answer denied that the plaintiff had ever been employed or requested by the defendant to make any sale of his real estate, or to act as his agent.

After the evidence was closed, the court gave one instruction at the request of the plaintiff, and two at the request of' the defendant, which, together, presented to the jury, with fairness, the law applicable to the question they were to try-The instructions which were asked by the plaintiff, and refused by the court, were properly refused. The‘judgment is, with.' the concurrence of the other judges, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lynch v. Bogy, 19 Mo. 170 (Mo. 1853).

19 Mo. 170 (Lynch v. Bogy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. Estate of Lewis
167 S.W. 666 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1914)
Hyde v. Honiter
158 S.W. 83 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
Painter v. Ritchey
43 Mo. App. 111 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)
Glenn v. Savage
13 P. 442 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1887)
Watkins v. Trustees of the Richmond College
41 Mo. 302 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1867)