Lynch v. Bogy
This text of 19 Mo. 170 (Lynch v. Bogy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff, in this action, claimed compensation for services rendered to Bogy, the defendant, as his agent, in effecting the sale of certain real estate belonging to the defendant. The answer denied that the plaintiff had ever been employed or requested by the defendant to make any sale of his real estate, or to act as his agent.
After the evidence was closed, the court gave one instruction at the request of the plaintiff, and two at the request of' the defendant, which, together, presented to the jury, with fairness, the law applicable to the question they were to try-The instructions which were asked by the plaintiff, and refused by the court, were properly refused. The‘judgment is, with.' the concurrence of the other judges, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Mo. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-bogy-mo-1853.