Lynch v. Awada

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 28, 2018
Docket73561
StatusUnpublished

This text of Lynch v. Awada (Lynch v. Awada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynch v. Awada, (Neb. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOHN LYNCH, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND No. 73561 KELLIE FUHR, Appellants, vs. YEHIA AWADA, AN INDIVIDUAL, Respondent. SEP 2 8 2018 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK,Qf SUPREME COURT

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE BY DEPUTY CLERK

This is an appeal from a final judgment in an action to enforce a foreign judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jerry A. Wiese, Judge. Having considered the parties' arguments and the record, we conclude that the district court properly denied appellants' motion for declaratory relief and application to enforce a foreign judgment. See Leven v. Frey, 123 Nev. 399, 402, 168 P.3d 712, 714 (2007) (reviewing de novo a district court's interpretation of whether a statute's procedural requirements require strict or substantial compliance). Although appellants contend that the district court erred in interpreting NRS 17.214(3) and Leven to require strict compliance,' "a court cannot deviate from. . . judgment renewal conditions purposefully stated by the Legislature." Id. at 409, 168 P.3d at 719. Accordingly, "Mlle judgment creditor or the judgment creditor's successor in interest shall notify the

'We reject appellants' additional argument that the statutory notice requirement was satisfied by registration through the federal court's electronic filing system because NRS 17.214(3) requires notice by certified mail. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A judgment debtor of the renewal of the judgment by sending a copy of the affidavit of renewal by certified mail, return receipt requested. . . ." NRS 17.214(3) (emphasis added); Markowitz v. Saxon Special Servicing, 129 Nev. 660, 665, 310 P.3d 569, 572 (2013) ("The word 'shall' is generally regarded as mandatory."). Because NRS 17.214(3) was not strictly complied with, the district court did not err by denying appellants' motion for declaratory relief and application to enforce a foreign judgment. Based on the foregoing, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Cherry

Parraguirre

J. Stiglich

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Lansford W. Levitt, Settlement Judge Jerimy Kirschner & Associates, P.C. The Wright Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Markowitz v. Saxon Special Servicing
310 P.3d 569 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)
Leven v. Frey
168 P.3d 712 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lynch v. Awada, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-awada-nev-2018.