Lynch v. Ashton

15 F. Cas. 1172, 3 D.C. 367, 3 Cranch 367

This text of 15 F. Cas. 1172 (Lynch v. Ashton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynch v. Ashton, 15 F. Cas. 1172, 3 D.C. 367, 3 Cranch 367 (circtddc 1828).

Opinion

The Court (nem. con.) was of opinion, in this case, that there was no contract, for want of jurisdiction in the justices of the peace, who undertook to bind out the boy.

And Cranci-i, C. J., said, the boy has no power to bind himself; nor has the mother alone, or with his assent, a right to bind him out, without the authority of some tribunal. The two justices had no authority to bind him out, as the Orphans’ Court was in session on that day. There was, therefore, no contract; xnd it is only where there is a contract in part executed, that ',his Court can compel the parties to execute it in an equitable manner, under the Maryland Act of 1793, c. 45, § 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 F. Cas. 1172, 3 D.C. 367, 3 Cranch 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-v-ashton-circtddc-1828.