Lynch Davidson & Co. v. Denman Lumber Co.

272 S.W. 803, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 1170
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 17, 1923
DocketNo. 8390.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 272 S.W. 803 (Lynch Davidson & Co. v. Denman Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynch Davidson & Co. v. Denman Lumber Co., 272 S.W. 803, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 1170 (Tex. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

LANE, J.

Lynch Davidson & Co., a private corporation, domiciled at Houston, in Harris county, Tex.,'brought this suit in the district court of.. Harris county, against Denman Lumber Company, also a private corporation, domiciled at Mt. Pleasant, in Titus county, Tex., to recover the contract price of certain lumber shipped by the plaintiff to the defendant at Mt. Pleasant, upon the contract hereinafter shown.

In due time and in manner and form as provided by law the defendant filed its plea of privilege, assérting its right to be sued in the county of its residence.

To such plea the plaintiff filed its contest, alleging that the contract between the parties upon which the lumber was sold and delivered was made in Harris county, Tex., and that a part of the cause of action sued on arose in Harris county, Tex.

The plea of privilege of the defendant was sustained by the trial court, and, from the action of the court, the Lynch Davidson- Company has appealed.

Facts.

It was shown that one W. H. Bratton was a lumber broker; that is, that his business was that of a broker in the sale- of lumber to such persons or corporations as were in the market for the purchase of lumber, for a commission to be paid by the seller, based upon such orders as he might receive from proposed purchasers and sent in to the seller, after approval by the seller. Prior to the transaction involved in this suit, the Continental Lumber Company, known in this suit and hereinafter called the Lynch Davidson *804 Company, the appellant, knew Bratton and knew that he was engaged in the sale of lumber as a broker, as above stated. During the month of September, 1920, and for some time prior thereto, appellant had received orders taken from proposed purchasers by Bratton on several occasions, filled many of them, and paid him a commission or compensation of 50 cents on each 1,000 feet of lumber shipped on said orders; none of these prior orders, however, were for the appellee, Denman Lumber Company. On the 10th day of September, 1920, W. H. Bratton called upon T. D. Denman, president of the Denman Lumber Company át Mt. Pleasant, in Titus county, Tex., and stated to him that he was with the Continental Lumber Company of Houston, Tex., and had authority to take orders for said company, and the Denman Lumber Company, thereupon, through its president, gave Bratton the following order for lumber:

Manufacturers, Dallas, Texas.
September 10, 1920.
Continental Lumber Company, Houston, Texas:
Ship — Denman Lumber Company at Mt. Pleasant, Texas.
Invoice to — Same, at same.
Price — F. o. b. Mt. Pleasant, Texas. Classification, 29%. cents.
Terms: 60 days net; 2% 5 days after arrival of car at destination; 1% SO days from date of invoice; 8% interest charged on all invoices after maturity.
Uis3WiFGdPlf0yCL

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hays v. Marble
213 S.W.2d 329 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1948)
Condor Petroleum Co. v. Greene
164 S.W.2d 713 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1942)
Normandie Oil Corp. v. Oil Trading Co.
147 S.W.2d 557 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Pierce v. Baker
143 S.W.2d 681 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Perkins v. Norris
25 S.W.2d 979 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)
L. B. Menefee Lumber Co. v. Davis-Johnson Lumber Co.
13 S.W.2d 962 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 S.W. 803, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 1170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynch-davidson-co-v-denman-lumber-co-texapp-1923.