Lynbrook Glass & Architectural Metals Corp. v. Elite Associates, Inc.

238 A.D.2d 319, 656 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3450
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 7, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 238 A.D.2d 319 (Lynbrook Glass & Architectural Metals Corp. v. Elite Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynbrook Glass & Architectural Metals Corp. v. Elite Associates, Inc., 238 A.D.2d 319, 656 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3450 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, Otis Elevator Company appeals from an order of the [320]*320Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated August 20, 1996, which denied its motion to compel disclosure.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying the motion of Otis Elevator Company (hereinafter the appellant) to compel the County of Nassau to disclose a certain report. That report was prepared in connection with a mediation agreement, entered into as part of certain ongoing settlement negotiations between some of the parties to the numerous actions in this complex multiparty litigation. As part of their attempt to settle this matter, the parties to the mediation agreed that the report and other similar reports, prepared expressly for the mediation, were to be kept confidential. It was therefore properly held to be protected from disclosure (see, Randall Elec. v State of New York, 150 AD2d 875; Crow-Crimmins-Wolff & Munier v County of Westchester, 126 AD2d 696).

In light of this determination we need not reach the appellant’s remaining contentions. Bracken, J. P., Friedmann, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hauzinger v. Hauzinger
43 A.D.3d 1289 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 A.D.2d 319, 656 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynbrook-glass-architectural-metals-corp-v-elite-associates-inc-nyappdiv-1997.