Lynas v. Stang

CourtDistrict Court, D. Minnesota
DecidedJune 2, 2020
Docket0:18-cv-02301
StatusUnknown

This text of Lynas v. Stang (Lynas v. Stang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lynas v. Stang, (mnd 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

DAVID W. LYNAS, as Trustee for the next- Case No. 0:18-cv-02301-JRT-KMM of-kin of James C. Lynas,

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

LINDA S. STANG, et al.,

Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion Regarding Continued Sealing. ECF No. 101. The Joint Motion seeks continued sealing of documents filed under temporary seal in connection with the Sherburne County Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 60, and the MEnD Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 75. The parties agree that five exhibits submitted in connection with these motions should remain sealed. These include three exhibits containing personal identifiers for a minor child, one exhibit containing medical or mental health data regarding other inmates, and one exhibit containing information classified as Law Enforcement Sensitive by the Department of Homeland Security. The parties also agree that one exhibit containing Mr. James Lynas’ medical and mental health records may be unsealed because the plaintiff has put such information into dispute and the records implicate the merits of the case. Based on the Court’s review of the documents at issue and the governing legal standard, IDT Corp. v. eBay, 709 F.3d 1220 (8th Cir. 2013), the Joint Motion, ECF No. 101, is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal the document at docket entry 79. Further, the Clerk of Court is directed to keep the documents at the following docket entries under seal: 65, 67, 69, 91, 95. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: June 2, 2020 s/Katherine Menendez Katherine Menendez United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

IDT Corp v. AR Public Law Center
709 F.3d 1220 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lynas v. Stang, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynas-v-stang-mnd-2020.