Lynah v. Commissioners of the Roads for St. Paul's Parish

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Lynah v. Commissioners of the Roads for St. Paul's Parish

16 S.C.L. 336

DecidedMay 15, 1824

StatusPublished

This text of 16 S.C.L. 336 (Lynah v. Commissioners of the Roads for St. Paul's Parish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lynah v. Commissioners of the Roads for St. Paul's Parish, 16 S.C.L. 336 (S.C. 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Colcock.

After the repeated adjudications which have been made or this subject, I did not suppose any doubt could remain. The principle is weli established íhát .replevin will not lie in such cases. If an individual is unjustly deprived of his property by the illegal determination of inferior tribunals, diereis no doubt an [337]*337action will lie against them; but a more effectual mode is to restrain them by prohibition, which may be done whenever they attempt to exceed their jurisdiction; and the appellant was well aware of his right to this remedy, for he actually exercised it in this very case, (as 1 suppose) at all events in a case against tliC commissioners of the roads. The subject is so well and so elaborately treated by TSfJ tTCtíl™ Sáy, m ine case oí wst and Cole, 2 Nott and M'Cord, that it is unnecessary.to attempt any further illustration of it. The motion is dismissed.

JYott and Richardson, Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Colcock.

After the repeated adjudications which have been made or this subject, I did not suppose any doubt could remain. The principle is weli established íhát .replevin will not lie in such cases. If an individual is unjustly deprived of his property by the illegal determination of inferior tribunals, diereis no doubt an [337]*337action will lie against them; but a more effectual mode is to restrain them by prohibition, which may be done whenever they attempt to exceed their jurisdiction; and the appellant was well aware of his right to this remedy, for he actually exercised it in this very case, (as 1 suppose) at all events in a case against tliC commissioners of the roads. The subject is so well and so elaborately treated by TSfJ tTCtíl™ Sáy, m ine case oí wst and Cole, 2 Nott and M'Cord, that it is unnecessary.to attempt any further illustration of it. The motion is dismissed.

JYott and Richardson, Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 S.C.L. 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynah-v-commissioners-of-the-roads-for-st-pauls-parish-sc-1824.