Lyn-Rand Metal Fabrications, Co. v. American Accessories Corp.

657 So. 2d 70, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7492, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1592
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 12, 1995·No. No. 94-24·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Lyn-Rand Metal Fabrications, Co., Inc. [Lyn-Rand], appeals from an adverse final judgment. We affirm.

Lyn-Rand contends that the trial court erred by granting the plaintiffs motion in limine to exclude any evidence of a purported oral agreement modifying the terms of the written agreement that provided the basis for the action below. We disagree and find that the trial court properly excluded such evidence where Lyn-Rand never pled the oral agreement with specificity in any of its affirmative defenses. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(d); Uvesco, Inc. v. Petersen, 295 So.2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Rod-Lyn Corp. v. DeBelay, 231 So.2d 233 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 238 So.2d 108 (Fla.1970). Additionally, we find that Lyn-Rand’s remaining points lack merit.

Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lyn-Rand Metal Fabrications, Co. v. American Accessories Corp., 657 So. 2d 70, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7492, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1592 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

657 So. 2d 70 (Lyn-Rand Metal Fabrications, Co. v. American Accessories Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McPhee v. State
657 So. 2d 70 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)