Lyman v. Rakopoulos

New York Supreme Court

Lyman v. Rakopoulos

2 Liquor Tax Rep. 447

New York Supreme Court·Decided February 19, 1901·Published

Opinion

Fitzgerald, J.

Leave was granted at the Trial Term (upon conditions) to withdraw a juror to enable defendants to make a motion at Special Term for leave to amend answer. The terms imposed by the trial justice have not been complied with. Notwithstanding this fact defendants seek the aid of the court upon this application and ask leave for an order permitting them to serve their answer. Under the circumstances as above stated, motion must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitzgerald, J.

Leave was granted at the Trial Term (upon conditions) to withdraw a juror to enable defendants to make a motion at Special Term for leave to amend answer. The terms imposed by the trial justice have not been complied with. Notwithstanding this fact defendants seek the aid of the court upon this application and ask leave for an order permitting them to serve their answer. Under the circumstances as above stated, motion must be denied.

Lyman v. Rakopoulos, 2 Liquor Tax Rep. 447 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

Pincite

2 Liquor Tax Rep. 447 (Lyman v. Rakopoulos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.