Lyman v. Howard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Lyman v. Howard

297 S.E.2d 21, 250 Ga. 185, 1982 Ga. LEXIS 1234

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 12, 1982

Docket39187

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 297 S.E.2d 21 (Lyman v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lyman v. Howard, 297 S.E.2d 21, 250 Ga. 185, 1982 Ga. LEXIS 1234 (Ga. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

The transcript indicates that (1) the extradition documents on their face were in order, (2) the petitioner was charged with a crime in Florida, the demanding state, and (3) the petitioner is the person named in the demand for extradition. It neither is necessary that the petitioner be shown to have been in the demanding state at the time of the commission of the crime, nor that he had fled therefrom. Anderson v. State, 243 Ga. 216 (253 SE2d 166) (1979).

The requirements for extradition set forth in Michigan v. Doran, 439 U. S. 282 (99 SC 530, 58 LE2d 521) (1978), having been met, we affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Marshall, P. J., who is disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI