Lyman v. Corey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lyman v. Corey

1 Liquor Tax Rep. 315

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Liquor Tax Rep. 315 (Lyman v. Corey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lyman v. Corey, 1 Liquor Tax Rep. 315 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a new motion to change the place of trial to any county. Held, that the moving affidavits are defective in that they fail to state the residence and address of the witnesses; also fail to state that the witnesses will testify to the facts alleged to be material to the defense. (See Tuska v. Wood, 81 Hun, 79; Hayes v. Garson, 25 App. Div. 116; also Lyman as Commissioner v. Gramercy Club, 28 id. 30.)

All concur, except Ward, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a new motion to change the place of trial to any county. Held, that the moving affidavits are defective in that they fail to state the residence and address of the witnesses; also fail to state that the witnesses will testify to the facts alleged to be material to the defense. (See Tuska v. Wood, 81 Hun, 79; Hayes v. Garson, 25 App. Div. 116; also Lyman as Commissioner v. Gramercy Club, 28 id. 30.)

All concur, except Ward, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Liquor Tax Rep. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyman-v-corey-nyappdiv-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack